X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Power to ICs with numslots > 1 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <526C1AF1.8000107@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:00:15 -0600 Message-Id: <9593B972-F050-4213-B124-DCF52BB1CF4C@noqsi.com> References: <201310261908 DOT r9QJ8Vv8025803 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <526C1AF1 DOT 8000107 AT sbcglobal DOT net> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r9QK0J2J021561 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Oct 26, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Girvin Herr wrote: > I have seen this done on production schematics. However, I am not sure they were "intelligent", just documentation. > Does this separate symbol method replace the net=GND:n and net=+5V:n etc. symbol attributes or are they still needed in the symbol? Do it one way or the other, not both. > The two methods sound redundant. Using the symbol attributes "hardwires" the net name, but the separate power and ground symbols allow netnames other than what otherwise would be specified in the symbol. I like that versatility. Yes. I believe Kai-Martin Knaack has created the most comprehensive set of symbols for this purpose. See: http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/ A good example of a slotted symbol/power symbol pair is: http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/symbols/analog/opamp_dual.sym http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/symbols/analog/opamp_dual_pwr.sym John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com