X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fFPEpcgvv8uo5eDevMyub4CX/t9kWpm18iCUxh0Dq7o=; b=pjlhDAREPDohFxw0bhSYqropp5jkOQHvqlVtAXKQvIvK+Ig/TxtMpWLwtLtjtgJJM5 vJMNd+dUvxNa1jrjfKgmdYERfVQmj5hZwnZs353a61gIVz1YTY8ggcOHLpg4PNl/uw92 GK3HtgnZ32xMtpx8IDrhh5up+bZ1M+F3hURVRWetaoSukEEKFWtr7N8RDhq7bqi4/vqL oy/tBRHg6xvqeTdtfmgJlV7E/FcG6CkhK/ho2a8xhe8GbHOkbFq7C8pIXzOcJSUr3SW9 0DFtsd9tBfTyqvVmTjheeCL1iGEJ9zNHWKUN8H2ktNK3LCSu8LCF2ZwShL43jaHJr2C1 11SA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.26.36 with SMTP id i4mr3157471igg.33.1382817201961; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:53:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <526C1AF1.8000107@sbcglobal.net> References: <201310261908 DOT r9QJ8Vv8025803 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <526C1AF1 DOT 8000107 AT sbcglobal DOT net> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 00:23:21 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Power to ICs with numslots > 1 From: James Jackson To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd76fe01cc41004e9aa387b Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7bd76fe01cc41004e9aa387b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 DJ, Thanks - I had a suspicion this was the way to go, but good to get confirmation. Girvin: I've implemented this method in my schematic, but haven't seen what the netlister / PCB layout software makes of it yet. It certainly unclutters the schematic though. Yours, James. On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Girvin Herr wrote: > DJ, > I have seen this done on production schematics. However, I am not sure > they were "intelligent", just documentation. > Does this separate symbol method replace the net=GND:n and net=+5V:n etc. > symbol attributes or are they still needed in the symbol? > The two methods sound redundant. Using the symbol attributes "hardwires" > the net name, but the separate power and ground symbols allow netnames > other than what otherwise would be specified in the symbol. I like that > versatility. > > Girvin Herr > > > > > On 10/26/2013 12:08 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Typically, you'd have a separate symbol that had *only* the two power >> pins, and the same refdes. The netlister will merge those pins with >> the slotted pins when the schematic is exported. >> >> > --047d7bd76fe01cc41004e9aa387b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DJ,

Thanks - I had a suspicion this was= the way to go, but good to get confirmation. Girvin: I've implemented = this method in my schematic, but haven't seen what the netlister / PCB = layout software makes of it yet. It certainly unclutters the schematic thou= gh.

Yours,
James.


On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:11 AM,= Girvin Herr <girvin DOT herr AT sbcglobal DOT net> wrote:
DJ,
I have seen this done on production schematics. =A0However, I am not sure t= hey were "intelligent", just documentation.
Does this separate symbol method replace the net=3DGND:n and net=3D+5V:n et= c. symbol attributes or are they still needed in the symbol?
The two methods sound redundant. =A0Using the symbol attributes "hardw= ires" the net name, but the separate power and ground symbols allow ne= tnames other than what otherwise would be specified in the symbol. =A0I lik= e that versatility.

Girvin Herr




On 10/26/2013 12:08 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Typically, you'd have a separate symbol that had *only* the two power pins, and the same refdes. =A0The netlister will merge those pins with
the slotted pins when the schematic is exported.



--047d7bd76fe01cc41004e9aa387b--