X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <525DA2D3.2040902@buffalo.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:17:23 -0400 From: "Stephen R. Besch" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Cheap solder paste source? References: <20131015083032 DOT GA24084 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <20131015180713 DOT GA5705 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201310151811 DOT r9FIBTRB030824 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> In-Reply-To: <201310151811.r9FIBTRB030824@envy.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PM-EL-Spam-Prob: X: 10% Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com I also might add that Bottom Posting also messes up the order in which people sequentially respond to a thread. aka: I've already read/seen that 50 times. Why am I being tortured with it yet again. Summary: Post on the top when you expect that everyone will read a series of posts in order, not just the last post. Post at the bottom when you want a series of posts to generate a narrative in which only the last post is read. On 10/15/2013 02:11 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > I really hate this example, because not everything in email is a > question and answer format. I think the only universally good thing > to do is trim the referenced text to only the relevent parts, other > than that, the format depends entirely on the content and how it > relates to the referenced text. > >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> A: Top-posting. >> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > -- fictio cedit veritati