X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=8DjwS635HTJ7OLorb+D08K7vCetIlxLQbFRgJyeZxNU=;
        b=cAOx3uRLBzriBydM1XFWE0Y3ka/nXOLYoILbFalXAHxoxQnxvOavo6Lt/AfFfaV1Pp
         fVcdR6usVmVByCjCqRMArvk/leTEDbjxq6HGJIjY7PpPn6s6QYiuqUrRP90dKmGAzf2p
         eEUbeZDEfQ+UuCeDPpLliXGkMWgruXSkw2+PWq17Ep3nQV18AniC1fjBvQAnvnWroQW/
         NEttm/mZhOH5DA0RX1yIK4jm+VTLG+ittPIRP6XZ+5OxxK1wonm7k0VgWWx2YBu/ekA4
         PsIw2oRD201v+Sj5i3n1tM2Ki11Y7Gi5nl+rGXzwKaAaa5FrDX1k8BDCyddCdiUuvs84
         VR/g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.186.202 with SMTP id ct10mr26448868vcb.14.1379321505768;
 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: silicon DOT on DOT inspiration AT gmail DOT com
In-Reply-To: <5236BA86.2070306@envinsci.co.uk>
References: <5236BA86 DOT 2070306 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:51:45 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a0Dw5-74rl64AbAKOZZIME8pf9k
Message-ID: <CAKakQcenx0_q4xOg0Y5BVMaVBUH7FeYWqvY=8Bi55pGhqNcAnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] request for clarification: via names vs pin names (pcb)
From: Stephen Ecob <stephen DOT ecob AT sioi DOT com DOT au>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b676fd061ed9a04e67c507c
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--047d7b676fd061ed9a04e67c507c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Matt Rhys-Roberts <
matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> wrote:

> I've noticed that when working with buffer elements which have been broken
> into pieces, it is possible to edit the via names (if through-hole) or line
> names (if SMT).
>
> Conversely, when working with unbroken elements, it is possible to edit
> the names of pin names (if through-hole) or pad names (if SMT).
>
>
Yes, press 'n' whilst hovering over a pin or pad to edit its name.

--047d7b676fd061ed9a04e67c507c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Matt Rhys-Roberts <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a=
 href=3D"mailto:matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk" target=3D"_blank">matt.rh=
ys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I&#39;ve noticed that when working with buff=
er elements which have been broken into pieces, it is possible to edit the =
via names (if through-hole) or line names (if SMT).<br>

<br>
Conversely, when working with unbroken elements, it is possible to edit the=
 names of pin names (if through-hole) or pad names (if SMT).<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Yes, press &#39;n&#39; whilst ho=
vering over a pin or pad to edit its name.</div><div><br></div></div>
</div></div>

--047d7b676fd061ed9a04e67c507c--