X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <1379037336.25012.3.camel@pcjc2lap> Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB: why does pin name lettering appear on top & bottom copper Gerber output? From: Peter Clifton To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:55:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201309101628.r8AGSkcs017932@envy.delorie.com> References: <522EF85C DOT 1000206 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <201309101628 DOT r8AGSkcs017932 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 12:28 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > AFAIK this is a feature, not a bug. > > I think it's more of a bug Definately a bug IMO. > , but one that's hard to fix with the HID > api we have now. What we need is CAM jobs that describe which drawing > layers become which output layers, so that things that make sense in a > PDF but don't make sense in a gerber, can be properly filtered. The GL code requires things a little differently, I just need to find time to finish re-factoring it all.. (It might help this case too). > What we actually have is a single "gui vs not-gui" flag that mostly > works but is very simple, so the user needs to be aware which parts of > the design are WYSIWYG and what parts are GUI-only. Perhaps we should > change pin names to be gui-only to avoid costly problems (and yes, I > know no change will be universally liked ;) > > FYI: generating gerbers in a Makefile is much more reliable anyway :-) -- Peter Clifton Clifton Electronics