X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] VE
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20130901043811.GA18909@recycle.lbl.gov>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 12:47:54 -0600
Message-Id: <1E387459-44FD-4E10-96EB-1D0E787B94D6@noqsi.com>
References: <CAGRhJMag+hNGutkiG6Mgr9+vxaSynkNEajR0HE2gs8GeZM0o0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130901043811 DOT GA18909 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r81IlrxX006507
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Larry Doolittle wrote:

> I'm very interested in being
> able to write generic numeric code, have it simulate (at first)
> at "infinite" precision, then establish real-life bounds and precision
> needs based on SNR goals, resulting in concrete scaled-fixed-point
> variables.  That is well beyond existing language capabilities.

Well, you can't really simulate at infinite precision. However, you *can* do algebraic circuit analysis at infinite precision. That's what gnetlist -g mathematica is for.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com