X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=+zBvkABP/RvlLMXeaL/p3g9+RVJaFYsmQGhiwybP0Ng=;
        b=b51Hw2MajySmVN2hqm+8C5pPjifNtsYjOsBWbhMkF9Re8ZLnIS7U9N5wOhOcMXAalZ
         fe4hqH3cJi0E8CKf52IODksxADsB4VA81/ZmUiGKQmWnFN/95uXoITSFszEjfAup3Lmn
         vylijWOTWJGpyYc9hx9kW/KWt2RXOfEjR31e/hpFF8zp2pUof4qpRGwBt3v/CChKGLqB
         d471MNXOZOETncfJaxAbf1Y/og8MXE71V/wViuo1yo8dVy7p8y6+fXo0P7sFh/rnbU7u
         svksHWYrcOpvnNqpqJSu7si31XCp6SIl8SdjOs7bXCGKGurGZ4kNq8HwaKFE9SFu8Kvy
         rc3g==
X-Received: by 10.112.210.136 with SMTP id mu8mr12680916lbc.25.1377628133752;
        Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:28:49 +0400
From: Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Tutorial: VHDL with gEDA
Message-ID: <20130827182849.GA25569@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <521B22D8 DOT 3030707 AT iae DOT nl>
 <CAMvDHVCZm+dYkFrbWoBMbnGvEv_nxr_OG+J3HM5EShhtd6kDBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <521C6317 DOT 7070605 AT iae DOT nl>
 <CAMvDHVCSRjqYw_wm7vO+qbX+bz373S=cvpN2zJ6_ZUC+WdL1bw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <521C7A68 DOT 1090900 AT iae DOT nl>
 <CAMvDHVD-CK77EbE7-LQUqQS-u0LJquX2U+3xAyr-J7ur8ikF4Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <521CA130 DOT 70309 AT iae DOT nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <521CA130.70309@iae.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:53:04PM +0200, myken wrote:
> On 27/08/13 14:01, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
...
> Like I write in the tutorial everything should work without any
> modification BUT it can be confusing to have an OUT printed inside
> an symbol which represents an input signal. Maybe I shouldn't use
> the word "bug". Should I just make the pintype attribute invisible
> then?

Yes, this would be better.