X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; s=beta; bh=MO8D fH1T0mZiHbhAEMGxCv0vme7Pa22G4KAXn5YQDGM=; b=DeJZ39EyvJV162Lcv6rY wHmmBAIWGAMqDgoMTtJvd/hKttTIAiQ+qdF18SqS54WXyaomppIPUII5nmB89857 jD0j83GirfOIMO4l2VpCyaZGP1673wl0iUA9WR9PUPuRWcIZU0oMdhYd5GC1Nr5Q RIY/lh9N0l1aIYzatMA2J8g= Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <51CBE8B3.9060701@prochac.sk> References: <51CA371C DOT 10507 AT prochac DOT sk> <51CBE8B3 DOT 9060701 AT prochac DOT sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Markus Hitter Subject: Re: [geda-user] LP699502-openscad-exporter Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:14:16 +0200 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Am 27.06.2013 um 09:24 schrieb Milan Prochac: > On 26. 6. 2013 3:51, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: >> Is your exporter available for download somewhere? > > Yes, now it is: http://static.bastl.sk/pcb/0001-OpenSCAD-export- > filter-0.1.patch Thanks. Nicely you've choosen a different name, so I could add it on top of the same feature branch. Using this branch, there's now an "openscad" and an "scad" exporter. This should allow simple comparison. > Regarding models: > Place all models into /../share/pcb/scad/ > models/ directory. Models should have all dimensions in > milimeters, they should lie on XY plane with center on Z axis and > they should have the same orientation as footprint. Do you have a few already? Please add them to the repo. An SMD and a through hole resistor should show on most designs how things are expected to work. One thing I've seen: You union full 3D geometry for copper and even silk. Wouldn't it perform better to union 2D first, then to extrude that? For silk and solder mask, 2D might be entirely sufficient. Anyways, thanks a ton for the work. No documentation, no sample models, but I could actually see silk and traces of a simple design. Excellent! Markus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/