X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Du3UCRD+ c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=wniM0YfUJoQA:10 a=oQDvWQo6hwEA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wR-FlJDvAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=RME7Cwcw2aEA:10 a=4AtYHsxDAAAA:8 a=p5Zxw5dPXY9tduL6TlEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=qXbWks-U9W4A:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 70.113.67.117 Message-ID: <51CA2655.1000907@ecosensory.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:23:01 -0500 From: John Griessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA References: <51B6CDB6 DOT 1010909 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk> <51BBA5E7 DOT 4040006 AT prochac DOT sk> <1371329763 DOT 11314 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <4DFFE27A-47A1-41DB-98CC-490E1AB6085A AT jump-ing DOT de> <20130617012721 DOT 01e56f87 AT akka> <51C48E65 DOT 10508 AT prochac DOT sk> <51C5BC66 DOT 6050308 AT ecosensory DOT com> <6C92EC8D-2A12-4E1B-8C08-C2812F4DBAD3 AT jump-ing DOT de> <51C7833C DOT 4080108 AT ecosensory DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 06/23/2013 06:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > STEP, hands down. > It is reasonable feature complete. It is. . . . .. . . > Only downside is, that STEP is a behemoth of a format. About the > extreme opposite of the PCB format;-) Some time back I hade a > cursory glance at how it does basic 3Dgeometry. Afterwards, I knew, > why kicad or eagle developers chose VRML for their 3D ambitions. What about this: http://stepcode.org/mw/index.php?title=How_to_use_STEPcode_in_an_application meanwhile, back to studying openscad again.