X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:34:03 +0200 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <51B6CDB6 DOT 1010909 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk> <51BBA5E7 DOT 4040006 AT prochac DOT sk> <1371329763 DOT 11314 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <4DFFE27A-47A1-41DB-98CC-490E1AB6085A AT jump-ing DOT de> <20130617012721 DOT 01e56f87 AT akka> <51C48E65 DOT 10508 AT prochac DOT sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-164-48.net-htp.de User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Evan Foss wrote: > As for BRL Cad's age. It has managed to hold onto it's google summer > of code participation. As to the user interface complaints many > people say the same thing about gEDA The UI of both, gschem and PCB is basically point-and-click. So this is no news to any computer literate these days. Yes, there are a few pecularities, in particular with gschem. But these are very minor compared to getting started with brlcad. Notice, how fast DJ Delories tutorial gets you up to speed with the LED board. > and we are not talking about > using it out right, we are talking about interfacing too it. To be actually useful, you'd have to use the mechanical CAD application in on its own turf. A library of components needs to be done, the mechanical design which the electronics should fit in needs to be modelled. Consequently, I'd put a premium on usability of the mechanical CAD. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak