X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-SourceIP: 89.173.57.57 Message-ID: <51BBA5E7.4040006@prochac.sk> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:23:19 +0200 From: Milan Prochac User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA References: <51B6CDB6 DOT 1010909 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gw-milan.doma.local Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 14. 6. 2013 20:50, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > I am not a particular fan of VRML. Me too. VRML is really horrible format by design. It tries to be friendly to hardware renderers (I guess) and it lacks lot of features. My plan was to visualize the PCB design. The VRML was chosen due its simplicity and possibility to examine nearly-realistic 3D model in real time. Other options - like HQ renderers (povray) or 3D modeller software - were not so straightforward, as they required offline rendering for each view or required additional software (and some extra knowledge to get some results from it). Additionally, the simplicity of VRML made it good candidate for my first 3D export filter, as it was quite easy implement it. > More often than not, when I import VRML > models into 3D CAD applications, the result was less than perfect (Autocad > Inventor, Varicad, solid works). Round surfaces are pieced together by > literally thousends of triangles. The object is represented by its > combined outer surface rather than by a set of basic object that combine > with boolean operations. My ad hoc explanation is, that this format is > specifically geared toward "virtual reality". The problem is that most of VRML exporters produce VRML models created from triangles. VRML format defines basic primitives like cube, cylinder, sphere - but they are not used in that case. As the complete CSG is missing in VRML, there is no other way to export composite object from CSG capable 3D modeller. VRML should be considered as final format (like PDF) meant for viewing or printing. It is not suitable for further processing, importing or modifications. > I'd be more than happy to see a lossless path from pcb to a open sourced > 3D CAD application and back. This would raise the level of awesomeness of > geda by an order of magnitude! Generally, the PCB design and generic 3D modelling are very different worlds. The path PCB -> 3D modeller is not so hard, but the opposite way is almost impossible, I guess. Well, the VRML export filter is real piece of working code (I will offer patch on Launchpad next days). It is capable to export the board design, populate it with components, it has some fancy features - it can create the the models on fly, adjust description or color, change position, combine IC with socket or transistor with cooler. It can be used as inspiration or base for another 3D export filters. I'd be happy to assist. The real pain is component library. I am not very satisfied with my current solution, as it is format-specific (each format requires its own models or generators). I am playing with the idea to define models in some high level (but simple) meta-language, which would be easily translated to target format. And as next step ... the whole board could be exported by generic "3D export filter" in that meta-language and converted into format of your choice afterwards... But it is all one-way road. Milan > ---<)kaimartin(>---