X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=qhRlYDMF3K2f/A2z8017LMuh2UBpFjGvQdhGY4zNhno=; b=0oGjettW/98Gp0q28VXMywWrKVmCVIIaxArfQResaXoZIAY/h1UAGgVwZiAsNBy4vJ /loHiL1Y44/y7yAOzUNhBFox6wu/sGeRPwFQoxaIr2O96Utj206Z/8zOL4zv3dNKZYjo J2DRcJQ4sUWfz1gdboj8I7rp7af2cBNi/84GZ9v4c6xkw51CzsIj+QtzgW4UJMKTZToF 1TIIUJXCm9+GttKoD9ECLJigWcBPRZ8CNLkr0UL7IrcZVYqDFNBK5nDu51RsYY6q86Kf bbJpKGmClu0ivoSE/rLpPDyZiJc4RUbKdM/lukmxC5YzmFkTSQfru37JS4SGkfoblw9H F2fA== X-Received: by 10.195.13.232 with SMTP id fb8mr38482854wjd.51.1365512307976; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 05:58:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Abhijit Kshirsagar Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:27:56 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: [geda-user] Large flat netlists - gnetlist/ngspice To: gEDA User List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From thread: [geda-user] gnetlist hierarchy uref order setting: On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:06 AM, John Doty wrote: > Some SPICE dialects, including > ngspice, have historically had trouble with memory leaks provoked by large > flat netlists, and it's usually faster to let SPICE do the expansion. Is there any documentation on this? I can't seem to find any. TIA, ~Abhijit