X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=SMOpzIjepeCpNf9MvRkG3cIkk40SJdPkaisQkv9GkJY=;
        b=vrBKuAal2SIlMtUfUFUkZAX5p6YOzl81UfXeKMcY6PbLaZ052dC0+2zTwx/CKO7cFB
         Qs/iCNPTBWj/hfteGAM93MckkPwKUOgBe+wcitfh7Sd2krQei0wYx1WxIsXqzSUTXwrs
         NEM5/UYTwU07TbXRXenwwUOEglbSP56dgI6Hyaf/a9gE/ETL7Zdb31WfypDmmpvOsRIo
         87YB+myf6S6gfpl+2/53TR9I9PUC9TDBb2FtIV/eLMKf+PXAbO5wN4KCVPcwFRhqLTy2
         efrbH8iCLx08tG7itMldQGjFvaduVAtdZ39Egh6rvKYL64OcLKPMraebEb2Mv/qA4pTu
         gJQA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.72.228 with SMTP id g4mr19931171wiv.22.1364957944303;
 Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAN0Jx-_Y0Fb3dACbT0H0mq3y45VORE7CPj7RgwMOHDyPxR0phg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACPio-58misa4nDUKcutj9KBwtgnLfwhJdd-yt8vq21sj0d_BA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAN0Jx-9Fx5HCuymYumKiRBuii7iU2ou3e7KYzdS9fO7LZPTSOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<kjfqas$u7c$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAN0Jx-_Y0Fb3dACbT0H0mq3y45VORE7CPj7RgwMOHDyPxR0phg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 22:59:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CACPio-4S+qFhjcOoLrPruR=Z88_==WiTNihM48-V134ChO=Nrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Footprints - mechanical pads
From: Nathan Stewart <therealnathanstewart AT gmail DOT com>
To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c819e67567804d96c09af
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--f46d043c819e67567804d96c09af
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Actually that worked. I just added attributes to the instantiation of the
switch net=GND:3,4. That way it's not part of the component.


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Russell Dill <Russ DOT Dill AT asu DOT edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
> wrote:
> > Russell Dill wrote:
> >
> >>> How should i handle pads which can optionally be connected to
> >>> ground?
> >>
> >> Just name them and you should be fine, no?
> >>
> >
> > If you connect GND to the pin without the pin mentioned in the
> > schematic, pcb will complain on the next "optimize rats". If you
> > mention the named pin in the schematic and tie it to GND, then pcb
> > will insist, you do indeed connect it to GND copper. Either way,the
> > connection is not quite optional.
>
>
> doh, somehow I misread the question completely. Ignore my response
>

--f46d043c819e67567804d96c09af
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Actually that worked. I just added attributes to the insta=
ntiation of the switch net=3DGND:3,4. That way it&#39;s not part of the com=
ponent.<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Russell Dill <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:Russ DOT Dill AT asu DOT edu" target=3D"_blank">Russ DOT Dill AT asu DOT edu</a>&gt=
;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im">On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:4=
1 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kmk AT familieknaak DOT de">kmk AT famil=
ieknaak.de</a>&gt; wrote:<br>

&gt; Russell Dill wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; How should i handle pads which can optionally be connected to<=
br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; ground?<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Just name them and you should be fine, no?<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If you connect GND to the pin without the pin mentioned in the<br>
&gt; schematic, pcb will complain on the next &quot;optimize rats&quot;. If=
 you<br>
&gt; mention the named pin in the schematic and tie it to GND, then pcb<br>
&gt; will insist, you do indeed connect it to GND copper. Either way,the<br=
>
&gt; connection is not quite optional.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>doh, somehow I misread the question completely. Ignore my response<br=
>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--f46d043c819e67567804d96c09af--