X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <5159535B.5030404@schinagl.nl> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:28:59 +0200 From: Oliver Schinagl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130322 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com CC: Edward Comer Subject: Re: [geda-user] Interesting Open-Hardware Project References: <20130329161824 DOT GA31378 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <1364741358 DOT 88032 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web120704 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <1364759292 DOT 24041 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web120701 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <1364759292.24041.YahooMailNeo@web120701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 03/31/13 21:48, Edward Comer wrote: > Only the Arduino Due is ARM based, all of the rest are ATmel based. The > ATmel boards are fine for 99.5% of what I do. However, The Arduino Due > is large, contains no on-board bluetooth and costs $50. The RFduino is > small, has on-board bluetooth and costs $19. In truth, I don't use an > actual Arduino in any final project. I use the Arduino-nano (the only > type that I own) and when the project is finished I use a bare ATmel > chip (usually an ATtiny85) and build a PCB. I may do the same with the > RFdino when I need more speed, which, admittedly, is rarely. My opinion > of Kickstarter is different than yours. I have invested in several > projects, none of which were technology based - this is my first > technology project. On technology I see, along with lots of junk, some > very creative projects that would probably never be launched without > Kickstarter as a funding source. Many of these projects will ultimately > fail because those involved lack the business acumen necessary to > succeed. However, their marketplace exposure will be seen, the > creativity recognized and may spawn competitive and more successful > efforts. Also, some of the projects do succeed. > > I don't know how all this works, but they claim, that a 32bit nordic cortex-m0 can run arduino (AVR) code without changes to the code? I'm sure you need some conversion lib/headers installed at the very least and recompile it to arm. If your using anything AVR specific it'll fail?