X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.ucs.cam.ac.uk/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <1359806241.3209.0.camel@pcjc2lap.cheyneydesign.local> Subject: Re: [geda-user] [patch] Pinnumbers in mosfet-with-diode-1.sym From: Peter Clifton To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:57:21 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20130131100136.GP32216@fi.muni.cz> References: <20130130090351 DOT GE32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1359555319 DOT 2295 DOT 9 DOT camel AT AMD64X2> <20130131100136 DOT GP32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 11:01 +0100, Jan Kasprzaka > The other problem is that the whole process (gschem -> gsch2pcb -> pcb) > _silently_ discards the nets with non-numeric pinnumbers. So you start with > a schematics, run gsch2pcb and pcb, and the resulting layout has missing > connections, without _any_ notification that something is wrong. Can you post a simple test-case for this? I'm fairly sure this should NOT be the case. BGA pin-numbers are often along the lines "B23" or "A10" etc.., and I _think_ " There is a strangeness with lower-case suffixes on refdes being ignored (by design - probably misguidedly). I don't recall having ever noticed it for netnames. > -Yenya > -- Peter Clifton Clifton Electronics