X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:01:31 +0100
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] geda-skeleton-project: Lowering the cost of a
 starting a gEDA project
Message-ID: <20130117010131.3d5d1578@akka>
In-Reply-To: <20130115203627.19881.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <87wqvhd4tw DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com>
	<kd21ao$j6j$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20130115013756 DOT 9917 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAOP4iL0yLZ-gvovCy5zCmJyjOXUUaoOB5U1+6CqcD20BM15FiQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<50F4E4D1 DOT 3010802 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1f=3TV5UKUjyJtpUw_5oBDxpk=5S2F=dEcUC2UYiNhVQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<878v7uv4gl DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL3fobzQNV5YN7kQ74L2Z2fsz1E3XJDffA1U+jBTF9qjXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20130115203627 DOT 19881 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/EHW=LerL9R9.2B/ug=aCf+t"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ECWXE5L3BBxugX9HTgKvgGIk4ro18FXUu2BmAGkoyxP
 McXITERyBi0JO6+ZeGBlyoESj5cvIzurVUqa2Bhw7X+qT0HAcO
 I6v/Px0jBBWcYww9BN8kn3AYdLK9uZlCcTbvXzht/9QWMw52RQ
 kHxGNpLQWoLMl9PBKwir883MSokr/kzPhKqJ30xghYeJso1Ig3
 q+xbyuz35SU+oNAfHbChYXmYe5GfJCysBdl+jyjd1J/fxuyVIU
 AB/gM6OMcke61vOUnEuElcQzJCrj/GMCZa7ZjCnAaI4zur7MRq
 VRvipL95IHPpBb25coSUUO10rUSA1UGd4OuQEp7SAokWKjh6Q=
 =
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/EHW=LerL9R9.2B/ug=aCf+t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se> schrieb am 15. January 2013:

> You are absolutely right that migration in and out of a given system
> are critical requirements for longevity.
>=20
> I'm thinking about how well the git data model fits orange. So far it
> seems really good.

I can only judge in two widely used version control systems: git and CVS.
My experience with them is mostly opposite. The more I know of CVS, the
more missing features I find. And there are "features" I would rather
live without, too. =20
By contrast, every time I wish git had something, it happens to be
already in place -- just unknown to me. Documentation by the project and
by third party authors is excellent. The intimate relation to the
development of the linux kernel virtually guarantees performance and
makes the project as future proof as it gets.

---<)kaimartin(>---
--=20
Kai-Martin Knaak

--Sig_/EHW=LerL9R9.2B/ug=aCf+t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlD3P1sACgkQt9RkiGwLn1NbVgCgiPWdF+ZgZIaleX1HLTBXfrU6
RGsAnjvJlnYhtHlPD2GsG/4cLKZxR7t5
=qKaI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/EHW=LerL9R9.2B/ug=aCf+t--