X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=NOScoTuAQPdxeObhFhH0ygoGM8R93qmSLQMqGFisku8=;
        b=sBHq16RMUA8yZQFG2kvSCPINJw4rDlods7NMBQnqfCilgbMzt2SXhXzcFkkoCt+rPb
         pTB0l7/ZfHHio/uakwdACdpdXm3bfnbq33GiJhcCY+gP70idve2IWXHyJzm8eJmwIyje
         Y6Wt03lx6qAvKxehpFNAZPbp8yPq2DtmQJhiRFxBTe3xgQ/kisKJ3sdSdHvrPBnA3t19
         qfAuklFzyO0MZl93nvCiKphtBcq5oyJhXvGYFFlAZHsbP0qCBoUR1exSw5pOkxewIc/D
         uF5aNVJqT18Y4IAPcuxVjABXa5uTueFzC8hItPOFm31foJaNvat18wiOmcSCEMqXgYmY
         +pbw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.21.70 with SMTP id t6mr4906429wje.42.1358375084675; Wed,
 16 Jan 2013 14:24:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <57B44348-7A53-4743-8A60-7C9D31EFD1ED@noqsi.com>
References: <CAFfN_23UzAVVk0-TSZyVZihFmq1-0v0gpB7o4uxe3KgxDFDG0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<57B44348-7A53-4743-8A60-7C9D31EFD1ED AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:24:44 -0200
Message-ID: <CAFfN_22hFE7AtMCXLvT-Up6ZxF=TZ7eYmr+PO5YbeFy7OU7Q0A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] libgeda circle parsing
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Antonio_Todo_Bom_=E2=9C=88?= <atodobom AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d3ef664d25a04d36f5877
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--047d7b5d3ef664d25a04d36f5877
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Nothing special.
Just think that if a function analyzes whether an angle is zero or
negative, as if this was an error. So should not leave yet as error.
Alternatively, changes to analyze only if is negative.


Well, for consistency a zero radius circle should render as a point at
> display resolution, since for larger radii it renders as a curve at display
> resolution. [snip]
>

Looking from this point of view. I think it is really interesting to
tolerate circles with radius zero.

Regards,
Antonio

--047d7b5d3ef664d25a04d36f5877
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<div dir="ltr"><div>Nothing special.</div><div>Just think that if a function analyzes whether an angle is zero or negative, as if this was an error. So should not leave yet as error.</div><div>Alternatively, changes to analyze only if is negative.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Well, for consistency a zero radius circle should render as a point at display resolution, since for larger radii it renders as a curve at display resolution. [snip]</div></div></blockquote>
<div><div><br></div><div>Looking from this point of view. I think it is really interesting to tolerate circles with radius zero.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Antonio</div></div><div><br></div></div>
</div></div>

--047d7b5d3ef664d25a04d36f5877--