X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AQg9t5SmqfkHaoH4Q4vGLqq1YMpMabSN5pFGTsE7axw=; b=ULAzW5ugT8GIl/64eHT7Am+WFO9jv2ud4Rx6czeF0vIw6BX07DvAiUfcDYHAZ+P3Xo 2VL6gp8jcO8erwL/ET2wqOGkM1Xa4D0x6x+H/RopiG82836Atqso//JHrABGj2Np2YzO LGTcNdFOsVGyGNIIskK+39WJV/7+etO4ugkLXLr+7qyOsxQ4/cOOCtq3TW8N3J4pmnlV DHHPJZK+lr8/zvkOHPsHFQtj7GUihHoYEZ65mNra/QW2aP8bmEorWVXXy4YfGvVjJLyv d6quaV+vc/TxFnpIPPl+Dhv4pGQ6EqsOereqGqOYU5EywxwWKSYDOZ+743qeoIDPI3tv DXow== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1356866711 DOT 18718 DOT 2 DOT camel AT localhost> <20130103234827 DOT 11387d18 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:40:02 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Split "find" colouring now in git HEAD From: Geoff Swan To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04440346a7bb9a04d274f00b Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --f46d04440346a7bb9a04d274f00b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I actually found this behavior useful. On a large net it was handy to have the coloring change based on which part of the net I selected. On Jan 4, 2013 8:50 PM, "Levente" wrote: > Sorry, yes, I mean rat, and copper object. > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Peter C.J. Clifton wrote: > >> On Jan 3 2013, Levente Kovacs wrote: >> >>> Just one note on this. >>> >>> If you select (F) a net which is not connected, it shows everything as >>> unconnected even the nets that are already connected. >>> >> >> Do you mean "rat", rather than "net"? >> >> If so, what you describe is expected behaviour, as the calculation of >> "connected" is relative to the thing your cursor was over when you hit "F". >> The rat is not (electrically) connected to anything (yet). >> >> >> If you select a net wich is already connected, it works as expected. >>> >> >> By net here, do you mean a copper object on the board? >> >> Or are you referring to selecting from within the netlist dialog. (I >> can't recall exactly how that worked out in the end). >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Peter Clifton >> > > --f46d04440346a7bb9a04d274f00b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I actually found this behavior useful. On a large net it was handy to ha= ve the coloring change based on which part of the net I selected.

On Jan 4, 2013 8:50 PM, "Levente" <= leventelist AT gmail DOT com> wrot= e:
Sorry, yes, I mean rat, and copper object.

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Peter C.J. Clifton <= pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>= ; wrote:
On Jan 3 2013, Levente Kovacs wrote:
Just one note on this.

If you select (F) a net which is not connected, it shows everything as
unconnected even the nets that are already connected.

Do you mean "rat", rather than "net"?

If so, what you describe is expected behaviour, as the calculation of "= ;connected" is relative to the thing your cursor was over when you hit= "F". The rat is not (electrically) connected to anything (yet).<= div>

If you select a net wich is already connected, it works as expected.

By net here, do you mean a copper object on the board?

Or are you referring to selecting from within the netlist dialog. (I can= 9;t recall exactly how that worked out in the end).


Regards,

Peter Clifton

--f46d04440346a7bb9a04d274f00b--