X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.ucs.cam.ac.uk/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <1356128362.2796.3.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary From: Peter Clifton To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:19:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20121221173921.GA25742@visitor2.iram.es> References: <1355861174 DOT 13534 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <20121220101819 DOT GA26060 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <1356003432 DOT 4776 DOT 10 DOT camel AT localhost> <20121220122149 DOT GB20493 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <1356100339 DOT 17857 DOT 0 DOT camel AT localhost> <20121221173921 DOT GA25742 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 18:39 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:32:19PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 13:21 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > > > > I can believe it. I really considered your previous patch a regression, > > > but color differentiation is going forward. > > > > Did you get a chance to try it out yet? > > I was just trying but had a problem. Cloning the repository worked but: > > git checkout for_master origin/for_master > > as you said in a previous message failed! What was the error message? What branches are listed with git branch and git branch -r > I first tried to navigate the repository with "gitk --all" and got > lost: too many rebases. --all is confusing for repositories using stgit, as there is a lot of churn in the .stgit branches. I use a shell script I call "gitkall", contaning: gitk $(git show-ref | grep -v ".stgit" | grep -v "patches/") $@ That filters out the stgit stuff. > However, the result of the clone includes the relevant patch > (the RATFOUND one), so I compiled and installed it. You might have one of my own branches then... it probably contains a lot of other cruft which you won't want, including changes to mouse wheel bindings, experimental GL rendering etc.. > I'm really pleased with the result; it does not adversely affect > my workflow, just the opposite, improving it somewhat (nothing > revolutionary, but noticeable in some cases). > > For me it's a thumbs up! Nice.. I'll have to make it a little bit more configurable, and figure out whether the "FOUND" flag should be applied to every object, or just the connected ones..., then I can push it. Regards, -- Peter Clifton Clifton Electronics