X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:02:29 +0100 From: Gabriel Paubert To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary Message-ID: <20121218080229.GA24102@visitor2.iram.es> References: <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SPF-Received: 2 X-Spamina-Bogosity: Ham Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 05:46:56PM +1100, Geoff Swan wrote: > I'll briefly throw in my 2 cents... > I think being able to manually assign nets to copper would be really > useful. I've done this when designing with altium and it works great. If > this where to become possible I think it would be well used. I also think > that having tools/heuristics/macros to assist along the way is a great > idea. As has been said neither heuristics nor net tagging are complete > solutions in isolation, but both sound like they would be useful to have > (even if not both can be done). > > My main reason for emailing though is to go back to what I think may have > started this thread in the first place... is there any chance of getting > the functionality whereby when I press 'O' to optimise a rats nest, then > hover over a net and press 'F' I get everything in that net highlighted? > (whether routed, partially routed or just connected via a rat) I'm sure I > used to be able to do this, and it feels like I'm hamstrung without it... I > note that 'F' will still highlight connected copper, but it no longer > treats a rat line as connecting disconnected copper... > It was a fantastic tool... I could use 'F' without the rats nest showing to > highlight only connected copper, or I could use 'O' -> 'F' to highlight all > the copper that needed to be connected... Indeed I miss this too. This was commit 764c3560a722c768a7048f5c70811ec363862882 which you hopefully can revert. Since around this commit the ratsnest also behave strangely when moving components. If I remember correctly, they had a proper rubber banding behaviour before I updated, and it is no more the case, but this may have been caused by another patch. While we are at it, I think that "O" should be rather a "ratsnest on" option. Processors are fast enough nowadays, and reoptimizing the ratsnest everytime you draw a line or move component would not be that expensive. In this case "E" should become a "ratsnest off" command. Gabriel