X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20121217033732.26277.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 04:37:32 +0100 From: Peter Stuge To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355577174 DOT 24123 DOT 61 DOT camel AT thinkpad DOT richardbarlow DOT co DOT uk> <34E3F8FB-5461-44D6-A287-2D74AFED5311 AT noqsi DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34E3F8FB-5461-44D6-A287-2D74AFED5311@noqsi.com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty wrote: > Short circuits involve engineering intention What? The short circuit discussed here is about separate nets in the netlist being connected together by copper in a design. > > The only bad thing with PCB's method is the highlighting of shorts > > I don't think that a program can reliably deduce the intention of > the designer here I don't think anyone is working toward such a goal. Why do you think that? The goal is to visualize violations of intent - nets connected together in spite of being separate in the netlist - in the most useful way possible, to save the board designer's time searching for the violating connection. //Peter