X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <50CB4CD3.3080707@zepler.net> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:59:15 +0000 From: Chris Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines References: <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <1355188647 DOT 12937 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <1355442697 DOT 2993 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <008677C3-7BA0-4B7D-B8E7-D0A5B2CCC573 AT noqsi DOT com> <898C7D41-7B55-4D61-9CC6-7ABB560C144E AT noqsi DOT com> <5189151C-7C93-4AD6-A154-185C8F7AC203 AT noqsi DOT com> <6E00459F-C749-4DE5-B182-44A8623E70E8 AT noqsi DOT com> <50CB1FFC DOT 1010600 AT zepler DOT net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 14/12/2012 13:41, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > In this system your above method is Markus' first touch method and some > extra details. With these details it would work better and would not > restrict the user to build traces only in one way, but I still have some > questions: > > 1. what happens if I cut an existing, tagged net in a way a segment > falls off? Does it become a floating (not associated) net or, does it > keep its tag reflecting original user intention? IMHO, the system should never automatically change an attribute from a specific to a more general value -- to do so is effectively throwing away information. The track segment should keep its association; the user can manually change it if desired. > 2. What happens if I draw a line accross the board shorting two random > nets? I started the line in the middle of nothing, so it would be > floating (if starting point matters; causing 2 shorts); or would it be > attached to the net of the first line it hits (first touch; only one > short, with the second line)? > > 3. alternative wording of 2.: what happens if I add an object that > connects an existing floating net to two existing non-floating nets in > the same time? To be honest I don't think it really matters, as long as it behaves in a consistent manner. I would suggest inheriting the netname of the first connected track and marking a short with the second. Chris -- Chris Smith