X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From: Enoch <ixew AT hotmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] [ANNOUNCE] geda-gaf 1.9.0 (unstable) released
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:42:55 -0500
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <87ip8g67y8.fsf@dome.home>
References: <87r4n7gey8 DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
	<50BCF47E DOT 4030503 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<87ip8jgcio DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-96-242-149-192.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g0hbXZhk9qjoRMz9+Wqkkv2vRQk=
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Thank you VERY MUCH for the continued gaf effort!

This release broke my exisiting rc files, for example, gschemrc:

(load-from-path "auto-uref.scm")	       ; load the autonumbering script
(add-hook! add-component-hook auto-uref)       ; autonumber when adding a component
(add-hook! copy-component-hook auto-uref)      ; autonumber when copying a component

Failed to load RC file [...]: Unbound variable: add-component-hook

Can the developers please post working new rc files with their pick
features?

Thank you, Enoch.


Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> writes:

> Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com> writes:
>
>> On 12/03/2012 01:37 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>>> Download ========
>>> 
>>> Source code: 
>>> ftp://ftp.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/stable/v1.9/1.9.0/geda-gaf-1.9.0.tar.gz
>>>
>>>  Checksum: 
>>> ftp://ftp.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/stable/v1.9/1.9.0/geda-gaf-1.9.0.md5sum
>>>
>>>  README: 
>>> ftp://ftp.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/stable/v1.9/1.9.0/geda-gaf-1.9.0-README.txt
>>>
>>>  NEWS (release notes): 
>>> ftp://ftp.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/stable/v1.9/1.9.0/geda-gaf-1.9.0-NEWS.txt
>>> 
>> The directory component "stable" should be "unstable".
>
> Haha, yes, it should.  Apologies to everybody!
>
>                       Peter