X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Objects of objects In-reply-to: References: <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <665E18E2-E9F9-40E4-9DE1-CC8FDBBDCB00 AT noqsi DOT com> <508EE43F DOT 5050505 AT neurotica DOT com> <9B14233C-F3A7-489C-BDC7-F6EAAAFCAB51 AT noqsi DOT com> <8835FFD4-C2F8-4EBF-BA06-2EFD38B47865 AT noqsi DOT com> <20121101124136 DOT 247F28117B6F AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20121101143159 DOT 3AF688130EC0 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <7A0F89F3-507E-43E2-B534-595B0B1013F2 AT noqsi DOT com> <20121102122705 DOT 7FAEF8130ED5 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20121120014626 DOT 651cb18c AT akka> Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Stewart message dated "Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:29:19 -0500." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20121120155003.E7B20813BDC7@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:50:03 +0100 (CET) From: karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Nathan: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > > karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar) schrieb am 2. November 2012: > > there are two more general concepts that are missing in gschem format: > > > > 1) parameters that can be passed to sub sheets > > > > 2) a way to manipulate the parameters during interpretation of the > > schematics by gnetlist. > > > > ---<)kaimartin(>--- > > -- > > Kai-Martin Knaak > > > > Agreed - something else that objects of objects would get us is 'slotting' > of subcircuits. Can you explain what you mean ? > At the moment the example I was thinking of escapes me, but > I think it was related to the question I asked a while back about doing > alternate PCB layouts. Actually now that I mention that, one such use of > parameters might be to associate a circuit with a PCB layout. So if I've > already done the layout for my super duper high side current monitor, or > 4th order Bessel HPF, and some reference to the layout can be put in an > attribute, when I import into PCB, it can just suck those sections of > layout in already done. That would be a change to pcb, we are still discussing what can be done at the schematic level. > Another feature that I think would be really useful is some kind of > concept of a reference or symbolic link to other components. So if I decide > to change my vendor_partnumber or even value, all 743 instances of that > component would change. You'd also want a way to make and break links if > you so chose. Can't you just do a simple $ ln -sf new.sym 743.sym and only use 743.sym in your schematics, dito for pcb, plus some kind of update the board. Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57