X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:28:43 -0500 Message-Id: <201211160428.qAG4Sh3h018631@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20121116041216.16057.qmail@stuge.se> (message from Peter Stuge on Fri, 16 Nov 2012 05:12:16 +0100) Subject: Re: [geda-user] git mirror of gedasymbols.org References: <50A1AD1D DOT 4030303 AT ecosensory DOT com> <201211131745 DOT qADHjHHY021575 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20121116030224 DOT 5c7750ee AT akka> <201211160225 DOT qAG2PrVD005630 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20121116035513 DOT 14519 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <201211160357 DOT qAG3vUXo017504 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20121116041216 DOT 16057 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > *nod* - but does that matter much? I mean: When there is a need to > look up authorship (not a common case) I think it would be OK to > have to look to the source code for the answer. It should stay the way it is. Each user gets their own area, and cannot interfere with other users' stuff.