X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=FP811sEMJO9zFtm4QM4KjUzcvMNRtSeokGBEbiavHh4=;
        b=QoljO+Uh8j3WWilXj8ahkHgdOk0g1vleV+8fSqccJFTofs+A+mca455zABQQueMg15
         /yRRGlVsS7ugGI3YDVszkznhrOztsb+uy9NLqGozh1dzuoL6YFFzF00CnboeSCkLkCBB
         JFDJ3XNPplJpKedJPDlOpblYuCPcRqJfhyU5/Js9VXgB8unpxsNlAGINHBQOO1HtXIau
         0TdzJ9NqLLPcajSn7D4Q6v5N+IgK8cpTi00MEQ473GDqyfZp52trAT2rmp6C1b9A09oq
         87fB7F/vXsblqxx2upmGlSwIuyu5HP/VLTCF0tnJBqZdw8aWSbasLquFGRRrcZdTfBS2
         JvtQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC4O8c-xvCH8j2h3K3+ymO0Zgbru_JqDavqojY81iT_C=-zPrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1511E63C-F435-44B1-9734-C7AF7AF49A92 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20121030132922 DOT GY32696 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<201210312340 DOT q9VNe3VW012697 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-xvCH8j2h3K3+ymO0Zgbru_JqDavqojY81iT_C=-zPrw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:16:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGde_xOu96b1jxN1n2km3_OAkX9umshs9FQF+Gdjgsbw_Mt4qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
 Pin hole size)
From: Svenn Are Bjerkem <svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 2 November 2012 23:49, Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> But as fair warning let me give an example what I think: all the how-to-use-git
> stuff from http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:scm should go away, as there are
> a dozen web sites that cover that better.  Maybe just the
> 'how-to-not-scew-up-the-repository' could stay.

You have had objections to this statement already, and I'll add mine, too.
Leave the page as it is, and add links to the pages you think replace
the contents of geda:scm. We can then look at them and judge before
deciding what goes away and what stays. The page is not intended to
teach git, just give devs and dev-wannabes enough to get a local
repository. We also need to catch-up with some loose threads from
remote forks and clones initialized by drive-by-devs.

-- 
Svenn