X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=NLdXCjGg c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=yvSPhu-8laEA:10 a=OYqO19DY7_YA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wR-FlJDvAAAA:8 a=2HzVpNkvsiYA:10 a=zzVsEzu1IhDrd65l_I4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 70.113.67.117
Message-ID: <5092B62E.3010901@ecosensory.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:49:34 -0500
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.9) Gecko/20121015 Icedove/10.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] More pins, one net (was gaf improvement - moving
 of components)
References: <HwV.JnH4.36n{7zfGcAr DOT 1GacLE AT seznam DOT cz> <CAM2RGhQy=RD0CUmvo7e9Cns52EddN3OFVSzEiUEHw+rh9rFWtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20121101155724 DOT GC32696 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
In-Reply-To: <20121101155724.GC32696@fi.muni.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 11/01/2012 10:57 AM, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> Evan Foss wrote:
> : That issue is just an artifact of how you are drawing things. If you
> : redraw that schematic with a short length of vertical net going from
> : the horizontal one to each pin it will behave as you want when the
> : parts are moved. I always have the pin terminate the end of net line
> : to avoid this. I also do that because I visually dislike doing it the
> : other way.
>
> 	I think this is one of the problems of gschem

It would be nice to not have to worry with this artifact.

If component terminals could touch along a wire without needing a stub of their "own"
and be dragged, it would be a speed up, as in "computer aided", as in ECAD or CAE.