X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com Message-ID: <508EE43F.5050505@neurotica.com> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:17:03 -0400 From: Dave McGuire User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: Pin hole size) References: <2CB304B5-9587-4734-84E4-49F464744D11 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de> <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <665E18E2-E9F9-40E4-9DE1-CC8FDBBDCB00 AT noqsi DOT com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 10/29/2012 04:11 PM, John Doty wrote: >> John, I like gEDA for the same reasons as you, but everyone else is >> still right. It will die if the new user experience doesn't get >> better. > > Why would it die? The need for power tools will remain. The need for developers is just as strong. Nobody will work on a package that nobody uses. (or that one or two people use) > I haven't found it difficult to get people to adopt gEDA. But no > layout person I work with is willing to use pcb. What do these people use that they think is so much better? I like it just fine. Eight years ago it was a mess, but it's quite nice now. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA