X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=seznam.cz;
	h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=DlHoxuoAohOOUpA5I+YCe8vaBgpVpTVldTb6oOPUqNnVlj5KPvMK/9yMjvDB0wSKW
	4JbljCkGrB3uTN/PSlI95rLKAFkwsLkqsj1Pw7nW4jlfQ+65F3RU5KrPNRY3WiGiWr6
	zGyCVsxiiSyBMl/ByfcCpWyhz1NLRibL7VVXlhI=
From: "Vaclav Peroutka" <vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz>
To: <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A_Re=3A_=5Bgeda-user=5D_The_state_of_gEDA/gaf_=28Wa?=
	=?utf-8?q?s_gEDA/PCBs_diversity=2C_Was=3A_Pin_hole_size=29?=
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 08:33:23 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <7V1.Jn9e.7G6zdaowZX5.1GZZ53@seznam.cz>
References: <20121028164801 DOT GA4859 AT alpha2>
	<CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<D04117DE-615E-412A-833E-4ED0F1B9A620 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<5FF7010F-BB82-41F2-8EBC-608E91E045F1 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<71Y DOT Jn6g DOT QcLTSHBZJi DOT 1GZPiP AT seznam DOT cz>
	<C2F4BC5E-4DD3-4FA8-972F-BF9C0E72CF1B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<508DAD89 DOT 9080603 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (szn-mime-1.0.72-5)
X-Mailer: szn-ebox-4.3.71-1
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

>>
>> I do schematic design. My customers' layout people do not use pcb. Right 
now, my major design project is VLSI (under construction at 
https://github.com/noqsi/VideoASIC), which pcb *cannot* lay out.
>>
>   
> Yes, and to put in my 2-cents on the value of gschem alone, I use it to 
> generate documentation for old and new projects for posterity and 
> configuration control.  Most of these projects do not contain custom 
> printed circuit boards.  I even use gschem to generate mechanical 
> drawings of chassis and custom parts for these projects, at least until 
> a mature open source 2D mechanical CAD program that runs under *nix 
> comes along.  I have hundreds of gschem drawings and so far, zero PCB 
> drawings. 

OK, now I understand. I personally use just gschem/pcb combination and haven't
 tried anything else up to now. So my assumption was not so impersonal as it  
should be. Sorry for that.

Anyway I would still like more modern PCB with more modern features and UI 
consistent to gschem. I had a look at liquidpcb (as it was one of targets of 
gnetlist) but this pcb is about 2 years without any update. And again, no 
tight cooperation with gschem...

Vaclav