X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject: Re: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: Pin hole size)
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 03:47:48 +0100
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <k6kqok$l6s$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20121028164801 DOT GA4859 AT alpha2> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de> <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de> <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de> <D04117DE-615E-412A-833E-4ED0F1B9A620 AT noqsi DOT com> <5FF7010F-BB82-41F2-8EBC-608E91E045F1 AT noqsi DOT com> <71Y DOT Jn6g DOT QcLTSHBZJi DOT 1GZPiP AT seznam DOT cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-183-8-181.net-htp.de
User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Vaclav Peroutka wrote:

> if there is no PCB in gEDA, probably nobody would use gschem alone.

John D. will be quick to point out other work-flows and that he 
actually uses some. These arguments tend to pop up time and again. I 
did a poll on geda-user some time ago. It was probably 2010 or 2009. 
You can look it up in the archive. (gmane archive, that is). 
Results were not very surprising: Almost everybody does gschem->pcb. 
Some also do some other work-flows. IIRC somebody even reported to 
start with pcb without bothering with gschem in the first place.

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak