X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=P12kUEx7uIPp1M/F5ul5+EaZe3Zm5kUxR+NgnjoXjQI=;
        b=yOoeyyUmixHaiKhBuURcofeW2iutiDvUMHj6o7w52Tlu9LFeDXgKzFpFsb8wQ6iD7O
         SK4l+h+FAEnrz3ruoKC53QzZ1wGSN3v9dq4/j4k5jT0ULn85K8m2ojmQwbbZ9MIlofy3
         0BqMTHgAWcKmz5oyHU+eYbYPtpyDmrCdnjvqUrWGVX6vg70JnpSzaUyw9ppCReb5TdOa
         VUAiFp19clLIbxIpkCTB2aiSX79wZJ8tg4lCgqGn96TwpPdpGtQVNWBFRwIzA/EA0C6l
         UsxsdVDW1052Ie1jifdKiaYQ3cQmB5xR63w+cn0ei/W+NDauycqfXWlhVAM4vOhqGclO
         Tn5w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615@noqsi.com>
References: <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<2CB304B5-9587-4734-84E4-49F464744D11 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:02:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c_Deo7QftYCHMrw9bhhD6ThO51NV3c+5FqAQtjHUKxsyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
 Pin hole size)
From: Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

>> Currently we have ridiculous situations like that pcb and gschem can't even agree on the same mouse button for panning/zooming.
>
> They are separate, independent tools with separate, independent histories, both predating modern GUI conventions. Why would you expect consistency here?

The right question is why not?  Modern/unmodern GUI architecture notions
have nothing to do with this issue and its useful if things work consistently
where possible.

Britton