X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID: <508B3FEE.8000200@neurotica.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:59:10 -0400
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf
References: <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50892DC8 DOT 6080308 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201210251629 DOT q9PGTfes029100 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <50897B77 DOT 1030401 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201210251859 DOT q9PIxw7n004895 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <F720A597-665F-40D1-B1A4-E02506EE5D09 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAGde_xNNrA-QMcXiNQJEkPSfFGeZWLyULAqh0pZfkPAV898NQQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <90F80A7D-69D4-408D-AD92-1530A48DFB9E AT noqsi DOT com> <CAGde_xPCOxpNub_QAVkChX_0UNVEfyNG2EVvKPXiF2arpyjcOw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <508AC939 DOT 2050205 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAGde_xOsh31ka8MOJJNGhuSdnSuExdbFMFd9Ws-=hiHNa+aUSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGde_xOsh31ka8MOJJNGhuSdnSuExdbFMFd9Ws-=hiHNa+aUSA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 10/26/2012 02:39 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
>>   I'm fighting with this exact problem right now.  From SCCS, to RCS, to
>> CVS, to SVN...and I'm very happy with SVN, but four other developers at
>> work are GIT fanatics, so I lost the vote.
> 
> git-svn can be the glue that keeps divided minds together. I am in the
> oposite position: Company standard is subversion and no discussion.
> Putting git on top of subversion is probably the best way to integrate
> the two worlds in a corporate environment. A nice clean mainline in
> subversion and all experiments distributed, but under version control
> in case you quickly have to stash away the current feature to switch
> to a bugfix.

  Well I don't need to integrate them; I use SVN at home (for work
projects as well as personal ones), but we're moving to a more
centralized development environment, for at least source code management
stuff.

  Thing is, I don't want to mess with lots of different tools, so in
moving to git at work, I will probably end up converting to git on my
home network as well.  (that's what pushed me to SVN from CVS! ;))

>>   At least I won the battle about the use of GIThub...all it took was an
>> explanation of what putting the company's extremely proprietary source
>> code and protocol implementations "in the cloud" actually MEANT, and
>> that discussion was over...we'll have an in-house GIT server soon. ;)  I
>> wish I'd had a camera handy to capture the looks of abject terror.
> 
> Gitlab in-house is what we use after a while with plain git repository.

  Oh, that looks nice!  And there was just a new release a couple of
days ago. ;)  Thank you for the suggestion; I will likely go that route
when it comes time for me to set up the server for work.

            -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA