X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=L1sOwbcJf8DWl0KNvTkBnjs3hPxLHAtfUhe4eLD7DE8=; b=apAaFrAk9xiDFAMGuYRLHZaFq2apVlxs9qrXZC6APZ7MtvTJVe86EkhWoK2EaYduis fzk5h2mVWpk17PjtVG6P5gsIa5itr7C3DVBgnEoKG3q7zuFxN+UXY+6NvKvUH+vTHFcx UigeMgUIutmZ0moajY2js5OyelauqXTOKukOOL6Bhr2eyxlEFfQcR3SgczPbVA689rP3 og0sNOFKEIyAE3EICThOdG7ZV1+f5FCRTpH4+HhjSYdDoiOfeKQhBVuNCrEzk0OXbykn 57ydTYcgdeK4VGomWx4T1zGqnxO6zUcoe8gchh0AXJojUJaj6PujuJQqJaGw5N2M8FHN Ck8Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8CD82772-DF1C-4C82-852C-B9F6A094CBAA@jump-ing.de> References: <50892DC8 DOT 6080308 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201210251629 DOT q9PGTfes029100 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <50897B77 DOT 1030401 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201210251859 DOT q9PIxw7n004895 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <8CD82772-DF1C-4C82-852C-B9F6A094CBAA AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:16:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf From: Svenn Are Bjerkem To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 26 October 2012 02:10, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Am 26.10.2012 um 00:51 schrieb Svenn Are Bjerkem: > > >> On 26 October 2012 00:11, Markus Hitter wrote: >>> >>> >>> One experience from another project - RepRap 3D printers - is, people are >>> extremely shy these days. I think it's to some extent because a few years >>> ago experienced users didn't hesitate to blast out a "you fool!" when a >>> newbie did something not entirely accurate. That strikes back these days, >>> press stories here and there about people taken to court for internet >>> postings do the rest. >> >> >> I think it is healthy that some kind of reality feedback reach some of >> the largest egos and pull them back to ground. Most people behave when >> using full name. :-) > > > So you propose shouting at people contributing work? This sounds _very_ odd > to me. Nope, I was more talking about the back-strike in court against the big-mouths. Wasn't clear in my reply. >> Probably the biggest no-go, in my opinion, is that git is not >> something a casual user/programmer knows about. > > You need a "git clone git://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf" for getting the > sources and a "git diff" for making the patch. What else? Depends if you want to keep a local copy of your changes in case you are asked to do more modifications. > > That said, the patches do exist already. Remote repos exist. It's all there, > so I can't find an issue with this. > The only issue I can find is that I don't have commit access to the geda repository and that I do not know what kind of patches or repositories we are talking about. With "remote repo" I understand stuff on github or any other place but git.geda-project.org. -- Svenn