X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:58:25 +0200
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gsch2pcb: pin labels missing
Message-ID: <20121024025825.21a01e75@akka>
In-Reply-To: <20121023124427.GF32696@fi.muni.cz>
References: <20121022155416 DOT GT32696 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<20121023112629 DOT GA32696 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<k662e9$ha0$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20121023124427 DOT GF32696 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Disposition-Notification-To: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/5h3UHKamwR=KjH/Me+=u9Wr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:QtBDlK4ZJGZPlYs5whYKb7R0aKwsRz49IfgWf7Pv6/+
 XoMIwoseCZqKa8qMHYf1yKnY6O1SWuFMXcXHtamVXD2Kp7ZTSM
 BWBogvJl7EjUNRvaVawCN4robJKuipdUM2LCC5WsbIAAbF7nFk
 u/vIzNHzLT8WCK1k8buyhrfVUEhwsO/uAgeDE4eSEJ7PC/YSjt
 c/cVXBpU+CFzTLFh8jSbg9ldKJR5B/qrzsBOuNA09CL3sFDaKL
 IBzVdGSI7wTMa/m2bgrhvbeW9cts+53o5Y8Z7rXHUPf0GHQ2w5
 NlEb0vlB8Mao04JiLKkiwe0v8KdoXpTFzKfq3eJilmQdgX94A=
 =
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/5h3UHKamwR=KjH/Me+=u9Wr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jan Kasprzak <kas AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> schrieb am 23. October 2012:

> 	I know that there is a tooltip wit the above data, but as I
> mentioned in my original post, the pin name displayed is not actually
> a pin name (e.g. GND, Vin, \_RST, ...), but a pin number (U40-1,
> U40-2, etc.).

Well, pcb supports only two strings per pin/pad. Unless you expand the
file format, the only option is to replace either of these with the pin
label. The netname is of course indispensable. This leaves the
"pinname". I don't think, this string is used anywhere inside pcb. It
may very well be replaced. Not every pin on a symbol may own a pin
label. How about this simple rule:

If there is a pin label, then the pinname in pcb is set to it. Else, the
pin name is set to the pin number. Would this break anything?

---<)kaimartin(>---
--=20
Kai-Martin Knaak
kmk AT lilalaser DOT de
http://lilalaser.de/blog

--Sig_/5h3UHKamwR=KjH/Me+=u9Wr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCHPTEACgkQt9RkiGwLn1PFFgCgsgL0hAqjxiDrq0j7Z9rZQvob
MTcAni8IitelvFJ9QvU/DEub8WxO0rHS
=bxj7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/5h3UHKamwR=KjH/Me+=u9Wr--