X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] In-reply-to: References: <20120817161012 DOT GA28947 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Stewart message dated "Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:29:15 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20120818184020.87DC7801FC27@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:40:18 +0200 (CEST) From: karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Nathan Stewart: > Apparently, the INPUT and IO components need to have a value=INPUT or > value=IO. I also had issues with the net= attributes on my power pins > - I had them labeled +7V and -7V, and at least -7V is not legal. So I > replaced them all with Vdd and Vss, even though emotionally I'm going > 'but but but there's nothing in the circuit that says it has to be > MOSFET!!!") and I secretly know in my heart that these represent a +/- > 7V split rail supply. It is my understanding that the pinlabel of the sym in the "upper" sch has to match the refdes of a pin in the "lower" sch. That is what I found out from [1]. I tested this in [2] (look for files hier.sch etc.). There i no use of "value=INPUT" or "IO" needed and "-5V" works just as well as "+5V". Regards, /Karl Hammar [1] http://www.easy-asic.de/downloads/HOWTO_hierarchical_designs.pdf [2] http://turkos.aspodata.se/git/openhw/pdftosym/examples.pintosym/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57