X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20120814174853.4373.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:48:53 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] silk layer names Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20120813012700 DOT 2106039c AT akka> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > See attached an obvious expansion of the patch mentioned above. It makes the > GUI show the actual name of the currently active silk layer rather than a > hard coded string "silk". > > If both patches are applied, the text of the silk layer button in the GUI > toggles between "top silk" and "bottom silk" when the view is changed with > the tab key. This makes it more obvious, which of the two silk layers is > currently active. All right. And thanks for the layer name comment in the other mail. I'm obviously not completely up to date with the code. :) > +++ b/src/hid/gtk/gui-top-window.c .. > @@ -487,7 +487,10 @@ layer_process (gchar **color_string, char **text, int *set, int i) > { > case LAYER_BUTTON_SILK: > *color_string = Settings.ElementColor; > - *text = _( "silk"); > + if (Settings.ShowSolderSide) > + *text = (char *)UNKNOWN (PCB->Data->Layer[solder_silk_layer].Name); > + else > + *text = (char *)UNKNOWN (PCB->Data->Layer[component_silk_layer].Name); How about: *text = (char *)UNKNOWN (PCB->Data->Layer[Settings.ShowSolderSide ? solder_silk_layer : component_silk_layer].Name); The if looks not great. And those identifiers are way too long in my taste. :) //Peter