X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:06:26 +0200
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] parts of a device to different (schematic)
 subsheets
Message-ID: <20120805190626.5605a071@akka>
In-Reply-To: <AF96E5FB-3AF4-4540-B7EA-7082458904DD@noqsi.com>
References: <20120804132146 DOT 662918283EED AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<20DFF748-1669-4718-8E52-A3EF480087F4 AT gmail DOT com>
	<20120805134222 DOT 1fe89dca AT akka>
	<AF96E5FB-3AF4-4540-B7EA-7082458904DD AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/mEgcw_+LNpD+UIsJYftC9Au"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:nn/JGMAbg7zaWnQPguaBpzwfuf1zQygRgDRI+UdDBHc
 wgO1F83WyFVxDDJgMb/u2LZQB0gz0cBq3/BJSrWzIWm162Zahc
 Ab6rjidew6kbKJC3AZT4Ot5R+N6CLHZ57pzCqtxpbNTqfIL/Wx
 PmfbjF3Pe/HEL4pmD6sJvJXzuur6YhuUxX4NkIWYGsvsbcYx7U
 2kGq4jzZH8TH4pmdWy5eBoUGjY7o+BCjPIFWG/dicyfrBNMpkr
 AmQdMfUrdsblvmOyM6Cuto//XUeUFlT3povUySjUDVOQ/OdT/l
 pGyDzyg36m51ZAZ0RWnJCpC/F8Hy2vqFXWma2gBg5aWtquhhQ=
 =
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/mEgcw_+LNpD+UIsJYftC9Au
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> schrieb am  5. August 2012:

> Depends on which gnetlist version you're using.

Unless stated otherwise, I always talk about current git head
versions ;-)


> 1.6 users will find
> that unless you have identical footprints for all instances, it's a
> bit difficult to predict what you'll get.

Even worse: If some of the parts do not contain a footprint attribute,
the component may fail to put it in the netlist at all. Specifically,
gnetlist always chose the symbol in the file to determine the
footprint. Order in the file depends on the order the symbols were
entered. This was one of the long standing bugs, that were finally
dealt with about a year ago. Now, gnetlist checks for conflicting values
of attributes and issues warnings. Unfortunately, like I wrtoe before,
gnetlist currently regards an absent footprint attribute as conflicting
with an existing footprint attribute value.

The more general problem of output depending on the order of GUI input
also remains to be dealt with.

---<)kaimartin(>---
--=20
Kai-Martin Knaak

--Sig_/mEgcw_+LNpD+UIsJYftC9Au
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlAeqBIACgkQt9RkiGwLn1OduACgiJgulHU8lBF2VLbJrh8i0c8W
rrAAnRXSrBGnkbI9jBPaGHMqU1x3RuJX
=j5l5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/mEgcw_+LNpD+UIsJYftC9Au--