X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: comp
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [geda-user] sym-files: duplicate pins
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <20120726171241.92D128279F8B@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:12:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

I'm testing the possibilities to have two symbols for the same device 
(but for different package size) having the pins in the same place.
Thus if I wanted to down/upgrade the size, I'd just switch symbols and 
all the pins lines up with the right net.

Now, I'm testing this for STM32F100CxT / STM32F100VxT. The 100pin 
package have two pins which are shared in a the smaller package.

One such is OSC_IN / PD0. In the 100pin package they are on pin 12 / 
81, whereas in the 48pin package they are both on pin 5.

Testing this out I get:

 http://turkos.aspodata.se/tmp/geda/test.sch
 http://turkos.aspodata.se/tmp/geda/test.net

It turns out that pin 5 gets connected to multiple nets

$ grep IC2-5 test.net 
unnamed_net7    R8-1 IC2-5 
unnamed_net5    R3-2 IC2-5 
$

///

So I wounder how to solve this, does anyone has a solution ?
And why are not one net allowed to connect to another net ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57