X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gnetlist: allow net= attributes without a pin
 number
From: Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <CAJisMU3X=s4YhgKxZsxQ7+Z4Obz=9xuKZjbveU9NL8aLQ482Pg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <000301cd644d$75518ab0$5ff4a010$@de>
	 <20120717160113 DOT 2caabc78 AT svelte> <500669D1 DOT 7000206 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk>
	 <CAJisMU3X=s4YhgKxZsxQ7+Z4Obz=9xuKZjbveU9NL8aLQ482Pg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-13"
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:50:15 +0200
Message-ID: <1342615815.2600.3.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q6ICpdoC027773
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:58 +0200, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
> This has been discussed several times.
> The consensus was that hacking this as a special case is frowned upon.
> 
> References:
> http://old.nabble.com/gEDA-user:-Attribute-Net-(without-pin-assignment)---for-Power-and-Port-Symbols-td31365921.html
> http://old.nabble.com/gEDA-user%3A-gschem%3A-net-attribute-for-power-I-O,-clean-appearance--(no-“%3A1”)-tc31102453.html

And my suggestion was that we simple do not print the ":1" in the
schematic if the symbol has only one pin (and that pin is net 1).