X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dHSF0JJn6HAIwkTk+aFash59JabMwIiJxMQoRnprIpc=; b=fHhCOhU9dvpuu8u7tt1Fn9+wlBYL+uLxEAYNnZOQIyUeMG8kyqJRZMWXmQCbJL5w9k WRE1jfHQ79ubrb8J0sWtBvpxTBS+4Ze5p28eckumIaTEkl6wS0qgaXY7f9n0r4t8fnD2 nvxD8b8fRJSChRiUe7pFPfSUlfDDz/57e324a6tQ1uN6s++FSN/67Ykm5BgbpJyveJlk G92hX9jJwBgHdCy+qN4eDTi/Wnp2m7vvv7K0zJXoXuxuYDT5LuO/v0JdfdpRdRoabjXP dvY4Q6FiX7XW9OUFgPRz7I8RrZnN9KkON29xuPoGnRilxz7tEmYRvDA7F7J+NOgSyAsv Fp+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [50.71.163.232] In-Reply-To: <20120530140222.GA21786@visitor2.iram.es> References: <20120528211420 DOT GC16992 AT malakian DOT lan> <20120529092557 DOT 62e0178d AT svelte> <20120530140222 DOT GA21786 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> From: Benjamin Bergman Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:43:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] extra mask, plating, and silk colours in pcb To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083adb4c732304c1d72d5a X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnCxmhPyj46Vy4KJ75yEfFLFUBUG2PsvWyPVePnkt5A54nlPvmsxfjxRzFV8kQgPAe1HfPn Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --f46d04083adb4c732304c1d72d5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry I went silent for a while there; work has been crazy this week. The impression I'm getting is that I should add a the copper and silver platings and the yellow silk to my patch before it gets integrated. I think this makes sense as changing it from a boolean later would break backward compatibility. Does that sound like the best plan? Unfortunately, I might not have a chance to implement this until sometime next week, but I am willing to do this. I'll add a new file to the bug report and send out an email when I get it done. I look forward to getting my first patch included :) Ben On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:30:12PM -0500, Benjamin Bergman wrote: > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gabriel Paubert > wrote: > > > > > Actually some manufacturers also offer silver, which is initially very > > > bright > > > but changes with time. > > > > > > > Ok, so perhaps I should change the gold checkbox to be a selector with > > options of tin (default), gold, copper, and silver. Is this something I > > should do? If so, could you provide a sample image so that I can try and > > match the silver plating? > > Sorry, no, I've never ordered a silver plated board. This said, I've seen > and even bought microwave cavity filters with silver plating but they are > in the other lab right now (50km). > > Metallic colours are impossible to reproduce exactly, but the RGB > colour (192,192,192) or 75% white is called silver. This might be > used as a starting point, but my impression is that genuine silver > actually looks a but more "yellowish". > > > > > One of my manufacturers offers: > > > - green (default), black, blue, white, and red for the soldermask > > > - white (default), yellow and black for the silkscreen > > > > > > Obviously, using the same colour for soldermask and silkscreen is not > > > recommended. > > > > > > > Similarly, I can change the black silk checkbox to be a selector with > > options for white (default), black, and yellow. Should I go ahead with > this > > change? Is so, can a good sample image be provided? > > Sorry, I don't have anything like this around here (I always oder boards > with > defaut soldermask and silkscreen). But I just did some tests on my screen > and > I'd suggest to start around (224, 224, 0). But opinions on colours... > > Gabriel > --f46d04083adb4c732304c1d72d5a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry I went silent for a while there; work has been crazy this week.
<= br>
The impression I'm getting is that I should add a the cop= per and silver platings and the yellow silk to my patch before it gets inte= grated. I think this makes sense as changing it from a boolean later would = break backward compatibility. Does that sound like the best plan?

Unfortunately, I might not have a chance to implement t= his until sometime next week, but I am willing to do this. I'll add a n= ew file to the bug report and send out an email when I get it done. I look = forward to getting my first patch included :)

Ben



On W= ed, May 30, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es> wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01= :30:12PM -0500, Benjamin Bergman wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es> wrote:
>
> > Actually some manufacturers also offer silver, which is initially= very
> > bright
> > but changes with time.
> >
>
> Ok, so perhaps I should change the gold checkbox to be a selector with=
> options of tin (default), gold, copper, and silver. Is this something = I
> should do? If so, could you provide a sample image so that I can try a= nd
> match the silver plating?

Sorry, no, I've never ordered a silver plated board. This said, I= 've seen
and even bought microwave cavity filters with silver plating but they are in the other lab right now (50km).

Metallic colours are impossible to reproduce exactly, but the RGB
colour (192,192,192) or 75% white is called silver. This might be
used as a starting point, but my impression is that genuine silver
actually looks a but more "yellowish".

>
> One of my manufacturers offers:
> > - green (default), black, blue, white, and red for the soldermask=
> > - white (default), yellow and black for the silkscreen
> >
> > Obviously, using the same colour for soldermask and silkscreen is= not
> > recommended.
> >
>
> Similarly, I can change the black silk checkbox to be a selector with<= br> > options for white (default), black, and yellow. Should I go ahead with= this
> change? Is so, can a good sample image be provided?

Sorry, I don't have anything like this around here (I always oder= boards with
defaut soldermask and silkscreen). But I just did some tests on my screen a= nd
I'd suggest to start around (224, 224, 0). But opinions on colours...
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Gabriel

--f46d04083adb4c732304c1d72d5a--