X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <4FBE8123.2090205@laserlinc.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:42:43 -0400 From: Joshua Lansford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Chassis ground vs Circuit ground References: <4FBE499D DOT 2090509 AT laserlinc DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Sounds like the edges shouldn't be plated as they would form new "drawbridges" in addition to the power supply header. (http://www.sigcon.com/Pubs/news/7_02.htm) The second link suggests the edges be grounded to shunt current. But this is only recommended if the inputs must reference chassis ground which mine are not. (http://www.sigcon.com/Pubs/edn/multipleadc.htm) But without sensitive analog signals to protect besides the Ethernet signal I am probably good any which way I go. I am just trying to learn best practice. Thank you Russell. That was informative. ~Joshua On 05/24/2012 11:26 AM, Russell Dill wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Joshua Lansford > wrote: >> Hello. >> I have an Ethernet Jack with a separate chassis ground. The grounds >> connect by zero ohm resistors beside the jack. Supposedly this keeps noise >> from following the cable onto board. I saw somewhere not connect chassis >> and together on the board but though the enclosure. The card with plated >> edges slides into a metal extrusion. Should both edges be chassis ground or >> should one be circuit ground? This supposedly keeps a DC difference from >> developing but dissipates noise. What are your opinions about how to deal >> with chassis ground vs circuit ground? >> ~Joshua > http://www.sigcon.com/Pubs/news/7_02.htm > http://www.sigcon.com/Pubs/edn/multipleadc.htm > http://www.sigcon.com/Pubs/news/2_17.htm > >