X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fvFelSEf c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=M_ffKnrP7SkA:10 a=DV_bBdnJwRYA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=Lko7n3X6QdKxB0bFJTUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 70.113.67.117 Message-ID: <4F9F14CB.8010907@ecosensory.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:40:11 -0500 From: John Griessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Down schematic hierarchy question References: <4F9D5D77 DOT 4080308 AT ecosensory DOT com> <15A5FC7D-2FDA-4EBD-A4C5-AA8C908B41E9 AT noqsi DOT com> <4F9D8849 DOT 4020508 AT ecosensory DOT com> <22F588A0-0729-4600-9B8C-34F213CCA92B AT noqsi DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 04/30/2012 09:26 AM, Ouabache Designworks wrote: > it appears that gschem was never meant to elaborate a design and can only operate on the pre-uniqified sources. Yes, and we might be able to improve that when making a verilog-ams backend for gnetlist work right and play well with gnucap. Possibly this summer of code...