X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20120418134211.19816.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:42:11 +0200
From: Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] New part
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <4F70E98B DOT 1080406 AT schinagl DOT nl> <4F7CD599 DOT 6080301 AT schinagl DOT nl> <20120404163815 DOT 197ce59d AT svelte> <20120405012031 DOT 13773 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20120405041611 DOT 26684 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <4F7D8499 DOT 6000900 AT schinagl DOT nl> <4F8DECA2 DOT 5000009 AT schinagl DOT nl> <1334744616 DOT 2582 DOT 4 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <4F8E9C72 DOT 60105 AT schinagl DOT nl> <1334747394 DOT 2582 DOT 6 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1334747394.2582.6.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > > Are you sure that your default DIP8 footprint is correct?
> >  From the datasheet, it looked like a DIP8 version was available
> 
> I do not really think so, after short inspection of
> 
> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74cb3t3306.pdf

The illustration on the first page resembles DIP but that's just an
illustration to show what the pin connections are.

Always look under "ORDERING INFORMATION" to find the available
versions of parts.

SN74CBT3306 comes in SO but isn't usable for this circuit.

SN74CB3T3306 comes in SSOP and VSSOP where SSOP is slightly larger
with .65mm pitch and .3mm pins vs. VSSOP .5mm pitch and .2mm pins.


//Peter