X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g/rq7cTsif78qM5b/SctY6Yn+VJvFVkpBvu3RDLC81w=; b=vUTECtRhVkoY4US5z4PEzbMU6LT0JGfz8s6s9+rjM0xs4fs0/t6M4KS4qV9oySyfV+ 6mnOkCP84Axh5gztC8DfFM18ondrVqOjtMZS51QgInFr3si0m5dmyImclPsRn/fIc4NR vl5h/tJiPW7B0n/lazz4Cj0/IMrTtWu/DmyspBwWTXBZztIQBZb+aAPjVLYp00Mzkujt /uJ1TIVd5MArMGD0lU0+YL07Zmb4POY8mqgTOSf2TPe89tX0OqXJbN12IFHgUubcyJMZ lVzwUvRobYcxABfvDlxSAZ2Lv0lWRDWrnkZo2fd1OuwA0OLGKllofKu2BNa1IlO9fn3k UbrQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: silicon DOT on DOT inspiration AT gmail DOT com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:56:02 +1100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2T-DlGWfQg5xrmy6DyG8Pc-Kbnk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Reed Switch vs Hall Sensor From: Stephen Ecob To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Rob Butts wrote: > I have been told hall switches are more reliable but they are all active > low. MTBF reliable or false alarm reliable ? Considering the low current you're putting through the reed switch I expect it will last a long time. How reliably it detects the pouch being opened depends on the reed switch, the magnet and how they're physically located. I'd use a small, strong rare earth magnet to ensure the switch doesn't false trigger. For really low power, why not wire the power supply for the entire circuit through the reed switch so that power is only consumed when the pouch is opened ? Stephen