X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <4F6B0AAA.5010406@laserlinc.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:19:06 -0400
From: Joshua Lansford <Joshua DOT Lansford AT laserlinc DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] use-license: unlimited, dist-license: GPL
References: <4F6A36A5 DOT 10807 AT laserlinc DOT com> <201203212124 DOT q2LLOCgh028905 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <201203212124.q2LLOCgh028905@envy.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Ok.  That makes sense.  So it sounds like I am good to use the symbols 
as long as the use-license isn't gpl or private.

Now ... what about this ... is sending pdfs of the schematics out for 
quote by board houses considered a distribution?

I would think not because it understood that they won't keep the 
schematic for their own purposes.  Thus we aren't "selling" the 
schematic just the boards.
~Joshua

On 03/21/2012 05:24 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> The GPL only covers distribution.  If you're not distributing the
> schematics, it doesn't matter what the symbol dist-license is.
> use-license is the appropriate one for finished boards.