X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk designates 10.213.8.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.213.8.73;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk designates 10.213.8.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=t0WhnqwkfR4ekTFw7qW/ayFTkx1lIbSLpaEioIy8V2Q=;
        b=RIss8MuMXwmPJyvge4Uq3kdthqbvvdw+3hCm5NF4BkB2XBGYwh9qBYw1QveVAEWF4H
         DqIMS5yPgngwAIPES4IeUiXy1WmFk2lpQz2x8xayWIXe+LccvsooiXw22RQ4RriTwKDI
         pd0eCL8eaxqUBOKbC8yjEKWRb0Y+VdDWDI1ZQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [109.144.211.58]
In-Reply-To: <CANqhZFwmbM-S+mnvcuEWCYtcrPta8bpvhnanP-Az-KiDMOhd1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F3E33C4 DOT 9050009 AT unige DOT ch>
	<CANqhZFw_w=79psp8+04UZ1HKURxCMOZNZTyDnhoKb5N=VdeYdA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4F3F8578 DOT 1060508 AT unige DOT ch>
	<CANqhZFwmbM-S+mnvcuEWCYtcrPta8bpvhnanP-Az-KiDMOhd1A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:22:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CANqhZFwy5i4=zftReahBSDFtX9Tu8sRFB2uUyWABsEcuvO11FA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] New geda release on Mageia 2
From: Gareth Edwards <gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk>
To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c196a2aefc104b93b4854
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIC+NW/6k9/lFZV+zDiHuF1ioVSKnDsBV8En5ZK27O32ILwnOlpEsrTWXVzC35YeymThXP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--0015174c196a2aefc104b93b4854
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Launchpad bug 934934 opened to track.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/934934

On Saturday, 18 February 2012, Gareth Edwards wrote:

> Hi Juergen
>
> Thanks for the pointer and don't worry about the list - now that I know
> what I'm looking for, I'll get a ticket opened and build a cleanup patch
> for this over the next few days (I'm out of town til Tuesday).
>
> Cheers
> Gareth
>
> On Saturday, 18 February 2012, Juergen Harms wrote:
>
>> Hi Gareth - thanks for picking up this (un-amusing) issue - I do not know
>> why somebody invested time to make rpmlint more complicated than it is
>> already - probably this is "lawyers-feed".
>>
>> And sorry that I did not explore things further. I now generated a list
>> of all the modules that trigger this error. Many of them turned out to be
>> auto-generated by one of the makes and I could skip them
>>
>> Result:
>>
>> There are both modules with correct and with incorrect addresses in the
>> geda package - the example you gave is correct: gschem/src/x_rc.c with
>> Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston,
>> MA 02111-1301 USA
>>
>> Here is an example of an incorrect one: gnetlist/src/vams-misc.c with
>> Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
>>
>> Doing the sorting and going back from the messages generated by rpmlint
>> to the source modules in the tarball is somewhat painful - I ended up with
>> a list of 92 modules but, given the manual filterering, I may have
>> committed some mistakes. Where can I send that list without annoying people
>> on this list who might have a slow connection?
>>
>> Anyhow, it is probably better to do a global search for Cambridge to find
>> the faulty packages by context.
>>
>> Regards, Juergen
>>
>

--0015174c196a2aefc104b93b4854
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Launchpad bug 934934 opened to track.<div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https:/=
/bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/934934">https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/=
934934</a><br dir=3D"ltr"><br>On Saturday, 18 February 2012, Gareth Edwards=
  wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Juergen<div><br></div><div>Thanks for the=
 pointer and don&#39;t worry about the list - now that I know what I&#39;m =
looking for, I&#39;ll get a ticket opened and build a cleanup patch for thi=
s over the next few days (I&#39;m out of town til Tuesday).</div>

<div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div>Gareth<br><br>On Saturday, 18 February=
 2012, Juergen Harms  wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Gareth - =
thanks for picking up this (un-amusing) issue - I do not know why somebody =
invested time to make rpmlint more complicated than it is already - probabl=
y this is &quot;lawyers-feed&quot;.<br>


<br>
And sorry that I did not explore things further. I now generated a list of =
all the modules that trigger this error. Many of them turned out to be auto=
-generated by one of the makes and I could skip them<br>
<br>
Result:<br>
<br>
There are both modules with correct and with incorrect addresses in the ged=
a package - the example you gave is correct: gschem/src/x_rc.c with<br>
Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA=
 02111-1301 USA<br>
<br>
Here is an example of an incorrect one: gnetlist/src/vams-misc.c with<br>
Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.<br>
<br>
Doing the sorting and going back from the messages generated by rpmlint to =
the source modules in the tarball is somewhat painful - I ended up with a l=
ist of 92 modules but, given the manual filterering, I may have committed s=
ome mistakes. Where can I send that list without annoying people on this li=
st who might have a slow connection?<br>


<br>
Anyhow, it is probably better to do a global search for Cambridge to find t=
he faulty packages by context.<br>
<br>
Regards, Juergen<br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>

--0015174c196a2aefc104b93b4854--