X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-MailCleaner-SPF: none MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-id: <4F3F8578.1060508@unige.ch> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:03:20 +0100 From: Juergen Harms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120203 Mageia/3.1.18-1.mga1 (1) Thunderbird/3.1.18 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] New geda release on Mageia 2 References: <4F3E33C4 DOT 9050009 AT unige DOT ch> In-reply-to: Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Hi Gareth - thanks for picking up this (un-amusing) issue - I do not know why somebody invested time to make rpmlint more complicated than it is already - probably this is "lawyers-feed". And sorry that I did not explore things further. I now generated a list of all the modules that trigger this error. Many of them turned out to be auto-generated by one of the makes and I could skip them Result: There are both modules with correct and with incorrect addresses in the geda package - the example you gave is correct: gschem/src/x_rc.c with Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02111-1301 USA Here is an example of an incorrect one: gnetlist/src/vams-misc.c with Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Doing the sorting and going back from the messages generated by rpmlint to the source modules in the tarball is somewhat painful - I ended up with a list of 92 modules but, given the manual filterering, I may have committed some mistakes. Where can I send that list without annoying people on this list who might have a slow connection? Anyhow, it is probably better to do a global search for Cambridge to find the faulty packages by context. Regards, Juergen