X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:02:03 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Lutz To: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-help] How to get element outline off-board In-Reply-To: <20210226140333.7D5E78248737@turkos.aspodata.se> Message-ID: References: <4b1d3d85-7f93-9eac-c4eb-9f84f2a47e61 AT bitflipper DOT ca> <20210225212042 DOT 16269 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20210226140333 DOT 7D5E78248737 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Hi Karl, On Fri, 26 Feb 2021, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > if I want to use *schem to make schematics with currents and voltages > indicated with lines and arrows, for inclusion into some doc. or paper what you want to be able to control here is *join* style, not cap style. There is no field for this in the schematic file format, and so far, I considered keeping the file format stable to be more important than introducing a fix for the arrow case. Lepton (ab-)uses the line cap field for that purpose, which mixes up two distinct concepts and isn't an acceptable solution in my opinion. Also, special-casing line width zero for filled objects kind of patches the issue here but introduces yet more inconsistencies. > In reacent geda-gaf, a few things that was formerly allowed, now fails > or gets annoying error reports. Unfortunately I don't seem to be able > test old and new gschem i parallell (having both installed gives me > segfaults, in /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin) makeing it hard for me to > show this. As I said before, gnetlist only reports errors for situations which are clearly broken or can't guarantee a consistent output, and warnings for situations which produce an output that most probably isn't what the user intended. If you think a specific error or warning message doesn't fall in these categories, please let me know so I can look into the situation. As for the port/power symbol warnings you asked about a while ago, these were added to new-style ("portname="/"netname=") port and power symbols as this allows catching common user errors which used to silently result in a broken netlist. You can just continue to use old-style ("refdes="/"pin=") port and power symbols if this is an issue for you. Roland