X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] How to get element outline off-board In-reply-to: <20210225212042.16269.qmail@stuge.se> References: <4b1d3d85-7f93-9eac-c4eb-9f84f2a47e61 AT bitflipper DOT ca> <20210225212042 DOT 16269 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" message dated "Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:20:42 +0000." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20210226140333.7D5E78248737@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:03:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Peter: ... > I think the fundamental difference is that gEDA/gaf moved/moves away > from using scheme scripting to Python, while lepton continues to center > around scheme. > > Both projects have relevant development, the basics should work fine in > both, so personally I'd only consider lepton if I were a scheme fanboy > (which I'm definitely not :) and choose gEDA/gaf otherwise. Both projects should be fine, and you don't need to be a scheme fanboy to be using lepton, and you don't need to be a c/python fanboy to use geda. My very own experience is that the lepton developers have been helpful with my small whishes. E.g. if I want to use *schem to make schematics with currents and voltages indicated with lines and arrows, for inclusion into some doc. or paper, the arrow ends are much easier to make nicely rendered in lepton. Example rendering and readme in https://aspodata.se/electronic/arrow/ In reacent geda-gaf, a few things that was formerly allowed, now fails or gets annoying error reports. Unfortunately I don't seem to be able test old and new gschem i parallell (having both installed gives me segfaults, in /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin) makeing it hard for me to show this. Regards, /Karl Hammar