X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20210225212042.16269.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:20:42 +0000
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-help] How to get element outline off-board
References: <xnh7nchcyj DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
 <4b1d3d85-7f93-9eac-c4eb-9f84f2a47e61 AT bitflipper DOT ca>
 <CAMw9acBn7xNo5jvrvS6Dof6JtYgOOLVKJwFFTu93S+CoPszjHw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMw9acBn7xNo5jvrvS6Dof6JtYgOOLVKJwFFTu93S+CoPszjHw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 11PLKiPA032211
Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Torben Friis (friistf AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Now I am confused - should I use gEDA or Lepton/Lepton-cli?

I think the fundamental difference is that gEDA/gaf moved/moves away
from using scheme scripting to Python, while lepton continues to center
around scheme.

Both projects have relevant development, the basics should work fine in
both, so personally I'd only consider lepton if I were a scheme fanboy
(which I'm definitely not :) and choose gEDA/gaf otherwise.


//Peter